任振朋, 王润斌. 2024: 国际体育秩序的生成发展、运行维护与中国参与. 体育科学, 44(12): 78-93. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2024KX050
    引用本文: 任振朋, 王润斌. 2024: 国际体育秩序的生成发展、运行维护与中国参与. 体育科学, 44(12): 78-93. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2024KX050
    REN Zhenpeng, WANG Runbin. 2024: The Generation, Development, Operation and Maintenance of International Sports Order and China’s Participation. China Sport Science, 44(12): 78-93. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2024KX050
    Citation: REN Zhenpeng, WANG Runbin. 2024: The Generation, Development, Operation and Maintenance of International Sports Order and China’s Participation. China Sport Science, 44(12): 78-93. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2024KX050

    国际体育秩序的生成发展、运行维护与中国参与

    The Generation, Development, Operation and Maintenance of International Sports Order and China’s Participation

    • 摘要: 国际体育秩序,作为国际体育和奥林匹克运动发展状态与运行图景的基础,反映了国际体育发展的逻辑理路以及运行机制。研究首先基于国际关系学和国际政治学知识论点和理论体系,归纳总结了国际体育秩序包含以国际奥委会和国际单项体育联合会为核心的权力主体,以奥林匹克制度规则为主、联合国等相关制度为辅的制度体系,和以奥林匹克主义和体育善治为主导的价值理念。其次,梳理了国际体育秩序形成伴随着奥林匹克运动和西方现代体育国际化发展,通过权力扩散吸纳利益相关者(权力主体)的不断加入、制度供给日益丰富和国际体育制度体系逐渐完善、奥林匹克运动理念转向和多元化价值理念不断交融并日臻完善。最后,研究聚焦中国实践,审视中国参与国际体育秩序在努力实现角色转变的同时,既彰显了中国特色的体育制度和价值理念,同时也面临诸多外在挑战和存在内在短板,未来中国应更积极地参与国际体育事务以提升中国体育国际话语权,通过制度供给和理念传播助力国际体育秩序重塑,努力实现中国体育治理能力提升与治理现代化。

       

      Abstract: The international sports order, as the foundation of the development status and operational landscape of international sports and the Olympic Movement, reflects the logical trajectory and operational mechanisms of international sports development. The research initially draws on theoretical perspectives from international relations and political science to summarize that the international sports order comprises: power entities centered around the IOC and IFs, a regulatory system primarily anchored in Olympic rules with supplementary frameworks from institutions like the United Nations and value concepts guided by Olympism and sports good governance. Secondly, it traces the formation of the international sports order, which has evolved alongside the internationalization of the Olympic Movement and Western modern sports. This process involved the power diffusion to incorporate diverse stakeholders, the enrichment of institutional frameworks to establish a comprehensive international sports institutional system, and the progressive integration of pluralistic values alongside shifts in Olympic ideals. Finally, focusing on China’s engagement, the research examines how the nation navigates its evolving role within this order. While showcasing sports systems and values with Chinese characteristics, China faces external challenges and internal shortcomings. In the future, China should participate more actively in international sports affairs to enhance its international sports discourse power. Assist in reshaping the international sports order through institutional supply and ideological dissemination, and strive to enhance China’s sports governance capacity and modernize governance.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回