吴坚, 贾泽军, 盘劲呈, 丁雅坤, 李宁. 2025: 我国体育学术国际话语权提升机理与组态路径——基于fsQCA的分析. 体育科学, 45(3): 43-56. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX024
    引用本文: 吴坚, 贾泽军, 盘劲呈, 丁雅坤, 李宁. 2025: 我国体育学术国际话语权提升机理与组态路径——基于fsQCA的分析. 体育科学, 45(3): 43-56. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX024
    WU Jian, JIA Zejun, PAN Jincheng, DING Yakun, LI Ning. 2025: Enhancement Mechanisms and Configuration Pathways for Elevating the International Discourse Power of China’s Sports Academia: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. China Sport Science, 45(3): 43-56. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX024
    Citation: WU Jian, JIA Zejun, PAN Jincheng, DING Yakun, LI Ning. 2025: Enhancement Mechanisms and Configuration Pathways for Elevating the International Discourse Power of China’s Sports Academia: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. China Sport Science, 45(3): 43-56. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX024

    我国体育学术国际话语权提升机理与组态路径基于fsQCA的分析

    Enhancement Mechanisms and Configuration Pathways for Elevating the International Discourse Power of China’s Sports Academia: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    • 摘要: 提升体育学术国际话语权对于进一步强化我国在国际体育领域中的影响力与号召力具有重要意义。运用质性研究、模糊集定性比较分析等方法,系统分析我国体育学术国际话语权的提升机理和实践路径。研究认为,体育学术话语内容、体育学者学术贡献、体育学科建设水平、体育学术话语载体、体育学术传播质量和体育学科发展保障是我国体育学术国际话语权形成与提升过程中的核心要素,各要素相互作用,共同推动体育学术国际话语权的生成与发展。围绕上述机理构建提升我国体育学术国际话语权的组态路径,按照核心主导条件分为专业主导型路径、学者主导型路径和传播主导型路径。在具体实践中,应以不同类型组态路径的主导条件为着力点,重视多种路径的协同互补,进而实现我国体育学术国际话语权的整体性发展与提升。

       

      Abstract: Enhancing the international discourse power of sports academia holds significant importance for strengthening China’s influence and leadership in the global sports landscape. Employing qualitative research and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), this study systematically investigates the enhancement mechanisms and practical pathways for advancing the international discourse power of China’s sports academia. The study reveals that six core elements—content of sports academic discourse, academic contributions of sports scholars, disciplinary development level in sports, discourse carriers in sports academia, quality of sports academic communication, and institutional support for sports disciplines—jointly drive the formation and elevation of international discourse power through their interactions. Building on these mechanisms, three configuration pathways are proposed based on dominant conditions: discipline-led, scholar-led, and communication-led approaches. In practice, targeted efforts should prioritize the dominant conditions of distinct configuration pathways, emphasize synergistic complementarity among them, and thereby achieve holistic advancement and elevation of the international discourse power of the country’s sports academia.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回