曹景川, 杨易, 连小刚, 颜秀真, 樊峻甫. 2025: 人工智能应用于当代竞技体育的价值论绎、伦理隐忧与精准治理. 体育科学: 1-9. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX027
    引用本文: 曹景川, 杨易, 连小刚, 颜秀真, 樊峻甫. 2025: 人工智能应用于当代竞技体育的价值论绎、伦理隐忧与精准治理. 体育科学: 1-9. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX027
    Cao jingchuan, Yang yi, Lian xiaogang, Yan xiuzhen, Fan junfu. 2025: Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary Competitive Sports: Value Propositions, Ethical Concerns, and Precision Governance. China Sport Science: 1-9. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX027
    Citation: Cao jingchuan, Yang yi, Lian xiaogang, Yan xiuzhen, Fan junfu. 2025: Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary Competitive Sports: Value Propositions, Ethical Concerns, and Precision Governance. China Sport Science: 1-9. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX027

    人工智能应用于当代竞技体育的价值论绎、伦理隐忧与精准治理

    Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary Competitive Sports: Value Propositions, Ethical Concerns, and Precision Governance

    • 摘要: 人工智能技术在竞技体育领域中的深度融入,既会为竞技体育带来技术赋能,同时也会新生一些伦理上的困囿。研究运用文献资料调研与逻辑分析法,探析人工智能应用于当代竞技体育的价值、伦理隐忧与治理方略。研究认为:人工智能应用于当代竞技体育的价值主要集中在微观的实践过程与宏观的系统整体两个层面,其中微观价值主要体现在促进落实科学化选材、为运动员提供个性化训练指导、保障体育赛事公正化开展;而宏观价值主要体现在推进竞技体育治理体系的现代化、助力竞技体育资源配置的均等化、缓和竞技体育主体情感的尖锐度等方面。但同时,在竞技体育领域运用人工智能也可能导致异化人的主体性地位、促成算法的权力寡头、引致责任主体的含混、激化数据泄露的风险等伦理隐忧。基于此,研究提出4条伦理治理策略:以理念为先导,加强伦理引导与教育,树立以人为本的长远发展观;用权力来制衡,以政府行政权力为重要依托,建设对算法权力的审计制度;进行归责设计,明确人工智能第一责任主体,或构建人工智能拟制联合体;加强风险防控,增强数据信息的保护与防范,完善法律制度的规约与监管。

       

      Abstract: The deep integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technology into competitive sports not only empowers the field with emerging technologies but also gives rise to ethical dilemmas. Through literature research and logical analysis, this study explores the ethical value, ethical concerns, and governance strategies of AI application in contemporary competitive sports. The findings indicate that the value of AI in contemporary competitive sports primarily manifests at two levels: micro-level practical processes and macro-level systemic integration. At the micro level, AI facilitates scientific talent selection, provides personalized training guidance for athletes, and ensures fair competition. At the macro level, AI accelerates the modernization of competitive sports governance systems, promotes equitable resource allocation, and mitigates emotional tensions among stakeholders. However, the use of AI in competitive sports may also lead to ethical concerns such as the alienation of human agency, the consolidation of algorithmic power oligopolies, ambiguity in accountability, and heightened risks of data breaches. To address these issues, the study proposes four ethical governance strategies: (1) Prioritize ethical principles by strengthening the ethical guidance and education, and fostering a human-centered, long-term development philosophy; (2) Balance power dynamics by leveraging governmental authority to establish audit systems for algorithmic power; (3) Clarify accountability by defining primary responsible entities for AI or constructing simulated AI consortia; (4) Strengthen risk prevention and control through enhanced data protection and improved legal regulations and oversight.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回