张晓强, 罗小兵, 彭小伟, 鲁长芬. 2025: 我国体育数字化治理范式研究. 体育科学, 45(6): 13-25. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX035
    引用本文: 张晓强, 罗小兵, 彭小伟, 鲁长芬. 2025: 我国体育数字化治理范式研究. 体育科学, 45(6): 13-25. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX035
    ZHANG Xiaoqiang, LUO Xiaobing, PENG Xiaowei, LU Changfen. 2025: Research on the Digital Governance Paradigm of Sports in China. China Sport Science, 45(6): 13-25. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX035
    Citation: ZHANG Xiaoqiang, LUO Xiaobing, PENG Xiaowei, LU Changfen. 2025: Research on the Digital Governance Paradigm of Sports in China. China Sport Science, 45(6): 13-25. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX035

    我国体育数字化治理范式研究

    Research on the Digital Governance Paradigm of Sports in China

    • 摘要: 我国体育数字化治理范式是党、政府、市场和社会等治理共同体在推进体育治理数字化转型过程中所秉持的一整套价值理念、思维模式和行动倾向。现阶段体育数字化治理范式整体呈现“数据治理”“平台治理”“数字治理”“智慧治理”4种样态,这些样态有相对清晰的演进脉络、适配维度和作用范围,同时在场可以较全面地阐释体育治理数字化转型结构与内容。然而,这些层叠共生的范式样态在推进体育治理数字化转型过程中依然存在数据偏差、平台“内卷”、数字悬浮和数字鸿沟等实践挑战,以及价值理念偏离、思维模式混乱和行动倾向失序等学理风险。对此,体育数字化治理范式发展亟需走向更为宽阔统合的“整体智治”视野。整体智治路径铺展应紧紧围绕理念、制度、结构和手段等治理体系要素,通过强化人本取向引领的整体智治导向,夯实制度创新适配的整体智治基座,巩固条块协同的整体智治体系支撑,维系体育整体智治秩序的动态平衡,以保证整体智治治理效能充分释放,为体育数字化治理推进体育治理体系和治理能力现代化提供理论支持与路径参考。

       

      Abstract: The digital governance paradigm of sports in China is a set of value concepts, thinking patterns, and action tendencies upheld by the governance community of the Party, government, market, and society in promoting the digital transformation of sports governance. At present, the overall paradigm of digital governance in sports have four patterns: “data governance”, “platform governance”, “digital governance”, and “smart governance”. These patterns have relatively clear evolutionary path, adaptation dimensions, and scope of action. In addition, being present can comprehensively explain the structure and content of digital transformation in sports governance. However, these hierarchical and symbiotic paradigms still face practical challenges such as data bias, platform internalization, digital suspension, and digital divide in promoting the digital transformation of sports governance. The theoretical risks such as deviation from values, confusion in thinking patterns, and disorderly action tendencies are also existed. In this regard, the theoretical development of the digital governance paradigm for sports needs to move towards a broader and more integrated perspective of “holistic intelligent governance”. The development of the overall intelligent governance path should closely focus on governance system elements such as concepts, systems, structures, and methods. By shaping a people-oriented approach to overall intelligent governance, we can solidify the overall intelligent governance foundation for institutional innovation and adaptation, consolidate the overall intelligent governance system support for block coordination, maintain the dynamic balance of the overall intelligent governance order of sports, and ensure the full release of the overall intelligent governance efficiency, so as to provide theoretical support and path reference for promoting the modernization of the sports governance system and governance capacity through digital governance of sports.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回