李亮, 张博, 闫睿骁. 2025: 体育史学自主知识体系的具身回归——基于体育技艺的认知进路. 体育科学, 45(5): 79-85. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX043
    引用本文: 李亮, 张博, 闫睿骁. 2025: 体育史学自主知识体系的具身回归——基于体育技艺的认知进路. 体育科学, 45(5): 79-85. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX043
    LI Liang, ZHANG Bo, YAN Ruixiao. 2025: Embodied Resurgence of Autonomous Knowledge System in Sports Historiography——A Sportive Skill-Centered Cognitive Framework. China Sport Science, 45(5): 79-85. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX043
    Citation: LI Liang, ZHANG Bo, YAN Ruixiao. 2025: Embodied Resurgence of Autonomous Knowledge System in Sports Historiography——A Sportive Skill-Centered Cognitive Framework. China Sport Science, 45(5): 79-85. DOI: 10.16469/J.css.2025KX043

    体育史学自主知识体系的具身回归基于体育技艺的认知进路

    Embodied Resurgence of Autonomous Knowledge System in Sports HistoriographyA Sportive Skill-Centered Cognitive Framework

    • 摘要: 在文化强国与体育强国战略协同推进背景下,体育史学作为联结两大战略并推动其落实的关键领域,亟须通过建构自主知识体系切实回应国家需求。研究认为,当前体育史学所遭遇的学科困境,原因之一在于对作为体育学知识核心以及体育事件发生本质的体育技艺缺乏充分关切,进而导致如下问题:1)体育自身的历史演进脉络未能得到充分梳理;2)作为学科的“道”与作为术科的“术”存在部分脱节;3)体育史学自主知识体系的凝练与建构面临一定挑战。研究在阐明体育史学可通过具身回归以应对学科困境的逻辑基础上,进一步对现有体育史研究范式的具身维度展开学理审思,明晰体育史研究应围绕“运动的身体”所承载的体育技艺(史),建构能够彰显体育史学自主知识体系的研究范式。最后,研究提出“文献-文物-体育技艺”三重互证在体育史研究中的方法论构想,着重阐述三重证据法的理论依据、适用语境与实践向度,以此彰显体育史学在筑牢中华民族体育文化根基、促进体育文明互鉴中的独特价值。

       

      Abstract: Amidst the strategic convergence of China’s sports powerhouse and cultural powerhouse agendas, sports historiography positioned as a pivotal nexus for implementing these dual national priorities-must develop an autonomous epistemological framework to address urgent sociocultural demands. This study identifies the discipline’s current challenges as rooted in the marginalization of sportive skills, the ontological foundation of athletic practice and knowledge production. Such oversight manifests in three critical gaps: 1) Fragmented historical narratives of sport’s endogenous evolution; 2) an epistemological divide between Dao (theoretical principles) and Shu (applied techniques) in disciplinary praxis; 3) systemic obstacles in codifying sports historiography’s unique knowledge architecture. Proposing an embodied paradigm as resolution, the analysis reconceptualizes corporeality within historiographical inquiry, arguing for a research paradigm anchored in kinetic embodiment-where the sporting body’s skill-laden history becomes the locus of epistemic authority. The study culminates in a novel tripartite evidentiary synthesis, systematically integrating textual sources, material artifacts, and sportive skills. This methodology’s theoretical rationale, contextual adaptability, and operational protocols are rigorously examined, positioning sports historiography as both a custodian of national sporting heritage and a catalyst for transcivilizational dialogue.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回