篮球鞋足趾动态设计与膝关节运动反应的生物力学研究

    A Biomechanical Investigation into the Dynamic Design of Toe Box Space in Basketball Shoes and the Kinetic Responses of the Knee Joint

    • 摘要:
      目的 篮球鞋鞋楦设计与运动员急停、跳跃及落地损伤风险有一定关联,本研究以2种不同篮球鞋足趾空间(toe box space,TBS)设计为切入点,探究急停起跳动作中跖趾关节(metatarsophalangeal joint,MPJ)活动度与膝关节力学特征的影响。
      方法 招募30名一级男性篮球运动员身高:(189.3±4.95)cm;年龄:(23.4±1.14)岁,分别穿着足部束紧型(tight-fitting,TF)与宽松型(loose-fitting,LF)的篮球鞋完成急停起跳的生物力学测试。采用配对t检验对不同TBS条件下的运动学和动力学数据进行对比分析,同时运用Pearson相关性分析方法探究MPJ活动度与膝关节运动状态之间的关联。
      结果 TF组MPJ背屈/外翻峰值角度显著大于LF组;LF组前交叉韧带(anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)力、髌韧带(patellar tendon,PT)力、胫骨前向剪切力显著低于TF组;LF组股内侧肌与股外侧肌激活度显著高于TF组;MPJ屈伸/外翻角度与膝关节力学指标(屈曲角度、接触力、ACL/PT力)的相关性在TF组更强。
      结论 TF篮球鞋因挤压足趾,导致MPJ活动度增大;反之,LF篮球鞋则为足趾提供了充足空间,允许MPJ维持其自然生理活动度,避免异常过伸。同时,股四头肌协同激活的增强,共同降低了ACL和PT的潜在损伤风险。

       

      Abstract: Objective: The shoe last design of basketball shoes is associated with the injury risks of athletes during sudden stops, jumps, and landings to a certain extent. This study focus on two different designs of toe box space (TBS) in basketball shoes to explore the range of motion of the metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) and the impact on the mechanical characteristics of the knee joint during stop-jumping. Methods: Thirty male national first-level basketball athletes height: (189.3±4.95) cm; age: (23.4±1.14) years were recruited in this study. They were required to wear tight-fitting (TF) and loose-fitting (LF) basketball shoes respectively to complete biomechanical tests involving stop-jumping. Paired t-tests were used to conduct a comparative analysis of the kinematic and kinetic data under different TBS conditions. In addition, the Pearson correlation analysis method was employed to explore the relationship between MPJ range of motion and knee joint movement status. Results: The peak dorsiflexion/eversion angles of the MPJ in the TF group were significantly larger than those in the LF group. The forces on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), patellar tendon (PT), and the anterior tibial shear force in the LF group were significantly lower than those in the TF group. The activation levels of the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis in the LF group were significantly higher than those in the TF group. The correlations between the MPJ flexion/extension/eversion angles and knee joint mechanical indicators (flexion angle, contact force, ACL/PT force) were stronger in the TF group. Conclusions: TF increases the range of motion of the MPJ by squeezing the toes, but LF suppresses abnormal hyperextension of the MPJ by providing ample toe space, thereby reducing its range of motion. Meanwhile, the potential injury risks to the ACL and PT are reduced together with the enhanced co-activation of the quadriceps femoris muscles.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回