杨震. 2011: 竞技体育运动是否是一门艺术?——20世纪后期西方“体育美学”的基本讨论. 体育科学, 31(2): 85-89. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2011.02.012
    引用本文: 杨震. 2011: 竞技体育运动是否是一门艺术?——20世纪后期西方“体育美学”的基本讨论. 体育科学, 31(2): 85-89. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2011.02.012
    YANG Zhen. 2011: Is Sport an Art?——Discussion on Sport Aesthetics in the Late of 20th Century. China Sport Science, 31(2): 85-89. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2011.02.012
    Citation: YANG Zhen. 2011: Is Sport an Art?——Discussion on Sport Aesthetics in the Late of 20th Century. China Sport Science, 31(2): 85-89. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2011.02.012

    竞技体育运动是否是一门艺术?——20世纪后期西方“体育美学”的基本讨论

    Is Sport an Art?——Discussion on Sport Aesthetics in the Late of 20th Century

    • 摘要: 介绍了20世纪后期西方对于“竞技体育运动是否是一门艺术”这一问题的探讨。这个探讨是现代艺术观念革新的延续。采取归纳法对这一讨论进行总结,按辩论者的逻辑,该讨论所采取的途径可分为三个方面:文化体制和体育评论界可否“赋予”竞技体育以艺术地位;竞技体育和传统艺术之间有哪些相似之处;竞技体育能否因其审美作用而被视为艺术,三种途径各有利弊。辩论没有结论,但深化了我们对竞技体育和艺术的认识。

       

      Abstract: In this paper,the discussion about whether sport is an art in the late of 20th century is introduced.This discussion is brought about by the revolution of modern art theory.By using the method of induction,this discussion is summarized.According to the logic of scholars,the way taken by discussion can be divided into three aspects:whether culture institutions and sports world of assessment can christen sport art;how similar sport and art are with each other;whether sport can be treated as art with its aesthetic functions.Each way has its advantages and disadvantages.The discussion has no conclusion,but has furthered our understanding of both sport and art.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回