不同羽毛球专用鞋穿着感知测试比较研究

    Comparison and Research on Perception Test of Different Badminton Footwear

    • 摘要: 目的:运用主观测试量表评价羽毛球运动鞋的舒适度。方法:以上海体育学院16名羽毛球运动员为测试对象, 使用美国某公司运动科学研究室提供的感知测试量表进行了试穿实验, 测试了两款不同品牌羽毛球专用鞋的鞋尖内部高度、鞋尖内部宽度、脚最宽处周长、脚腰/脚背、脚后跟和长等不同部位的穿着舒适度以及足底黏附性、前足柔韧性、脚后跟缓冲、脚后跟响应、脚后跟稳定性、后跟-脚趾过渡、前脚缓冲和整体感觉等不同性能指标。结果:从总体舒适度量表 (General Fit Ballot) 的各指标来看, 除了鞋长度指标外, A鞋的其余各指标都存在一定的问题;从鞋性能动态测试量表 (Dynamic Ballot) 中喜爱程度 (Liking) 各指标来看, 鞋A在脚后跟缓冲、后跟-脚趾过渡、前脚缓冲、足底黏附性、前足柔韧性等方面依然有很多不足, 有待继续改进;对于鞋性能动态测试量表 (Dynamic Ballot) 指标强度 (Intensity) 而言, A鞋的足底黏附性 (Underfoot Traction) 和前足柔韧性 (Forefoot Flexibility) 明显不足、前足柔韧性和脚后跟稳定性明显有缺憾。结论:该量表适宜评价运动鞋的舒适度和相关运动性能, 是运动鞋设计和制造过程中的一种重要方法。

       

      Abstract: Objective:To assess the comfort of sport footwear with General Fit Ballot and Dynamic Ballot.Method:Taking 16 elite badminton male athletes from Shanghai University of Sport as research subjects, the field test was used to explore the differences between Shoe A and Shoe B with measurement scale.The scale includes General Fit Ballot and Dynamic Ballot.The former includes the variables:toe box height, toe box width, ball girth, waist/instep, heel and length;the latter includes underfoot traction, forefoot flexibility, heel cushioning, heel responsiveness, heel stability, heel-to-toe transition, forefoot cushioning and overall liking.Results:All the variables of shoe A are not so good except for the length from the General Fit Ballot;The heel cushioning, heel-to-toe transition, forefoot cushioning, underfoot traction and forefoot flexibility of shoe A should be made better from the liking of Dynamic Ballot;The underfoot traction, and forefoot flexibility are not enough to help to improve the sport performance of badminton.Conclusion:The results showed that the measurement scale is good for the evaluation of comfort, fit and dynamic function of badminton footwear.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回