姜熙. 2012: 职业体育联盟运动员流动限制的反垄断思考. 体育科学, 32(7): 58-70. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2012.07.009
    引用本文: 姜熙. 2012: 职业体育联盟运动员流动限制的反垄断思考. 体育科学, 32(7): 58-70. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2012.07.009
    JIANG Xi. 2012: A Antitrust Analysis of Player Mobility Restrictions of Professional Sports Leagues. China Sport Science, 32(7): 58-70. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2012.07.009
    Citation: JIANG Xi. 2012: A Antitrust Analysis of Player Mobility Restrictions of Professional Sports Leagues. China Sport Science, 32(7): 58-70. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2012.07.009

    职业体育联盟运动员流动限制的反垄断思考

    A Antitrust Analysis of Player Mobility Restrictions of Professional Sports Leagues

    • 摘要: 主要采用案例分析、文献分析、比较分析、逻辑分析和例证分析等方法对涉及限制运动员自由流动的反垄断案件中职业体育联盟以“竞争性平衡”作为抗辩理由是否成立的问题进行了系统的研究。研究表明,虽然“竞争性平衡”对于职业体育联盟的发展至关重要,但职业体育联盟所采取的运动员流动限制措施对运动员的分配没有产生实际的影响,所以,职业体育联盟“竞争性平衡”的抗辩不能证明对运动员流动进行限制在反垄断法意义上的合法性。

       

      Abstract: This Article used Case analysis,Literature research,Comparative Analysis and logic analysis,discuss whether “competitive balance” as a argument to Athletes restriction is legitimacy.The important conclusion is that the Athletes Restriction system has no impact on distribution of athletes,and Athletes Restriction system have no benefits to “competitive balance”.Taking all these factors into consideration,we can safely come to conclusion that the “competitive balance” argument is seriously flawed.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回