伦敦奥运会体育仲裁案件述评
Commentary on the Arbitration Awards of London Olympic Games
-
摘要: 国际体育仲裁院在伦敦举办的第30届奥运会上设立了临时仲裁庭,负责仲裁与奥运会相关的体育纠纷,仲裁庭共仲裁了11件案件,主要为参赛资格纠纷案件和比赛结果纠纷案件,没有因为奥运会期间兴奋剂检测而引起的纠纷提交仲裁。运用文献分析和逻辑分析的方法,简要介绍了这些案件,总结和归纳了这些仲裁实践对体育法和体育仲裁的发展和挑战。研究认为,相关奥运会仲裁裁决存在着冲突,可通过修改仲裁规则等方式保障仲裁裁决的一致性,临时仲裁庭的管辖权必须符合时间要求和与奥运会的关联性要求,仲裁裁决执行应该充分利用国际奥委会的权威性。Abstract: The Court of Arbitration for Sport set up an Ad Hoc Division in the London Olympic Games,all disputes in connection with the Olympic Games shall be exclucively submitted to it,the Ad Hoc Division solved eleven cases,including cases about disputes of accreditation,field-of-play decision,no case about doping test on the occassion of London Olympic Games.This paper,employing the method of literature review and logical analysis,introducing and commenting the cases during the London Olympic Games,given summarizes the arbitration practice on the development and challenge in the area of sports law and sports arbitration.The result shows that there exists conflict among Olympic Games arbitration awards,we can modify the arbitration rules to guarantee the consistency.Jurisdiction of Ad Hoc Division must meet the time requirement and in connection with the Olympic Games.The enforcement of arbitration award should make full use of the authority of the International Olympic Committee.