中华05RUS-CHN法骨龄评价可靠性的再检验
The Retest on Reliability of Assessing Skeletal Age by China 05RUS-CHN Method
-
摘要: 目的:检验当前应用《中国人手腕骨发育标准-中华05》RUS-CHN法骨龄评价的可靠性。方法:13名评价者以中华05RUS-CHN法, 评价45名儿童青少年 (骨龄218岁) 左手腕后前位X线片, 30天后重复阅读。以等级相同例数的百分数和骨龄差值评估骨龄评价的可靠性。结果:评价者内和评价者与标准间RUS-CHN骨发育等级重复率分别为70.5%92.1% (平均数84.3%) 和69.0%83.3% (平均数78.1%) , 骨龄差值95%置信区间分别为±0.26±0.49岁和±0.35±0.56岁。结论:经过多次培训和长期骨龄评价经验的积累, 使用中华05RUS-CHN法的可靠性显著提高, 应坚持定期以骨发育等级重复率和骨龄评价的系统误差和随机误差综合评估可靠性。Abstract: Objective:The reliability of“The Standards of Skeletal Maturity of Hand and Wrist for Chinese-China 05”RUS-CHN method were reexamined in present.Methods:Under the conditions that readers were blinded to the age of the children and sex, the hand and wrist radiographs of 45children (skeletal age 2to 18years) were independently read by 13readers using China 05RUS-CHN method.The radiographs were re-read by same readers 30days later.The percentage agreement in ratings and the differences of skeletal age in repeating were estimated to evaluate the reliability.Results:It was found that intraobserver percentage agreement of ratings were 70.5% to 92.1% (mean 84.3%) , and the 95% confidence limits for a single reading were ±0.26year to ±0.49year for China 05 RUS-CHN;b) interobserver percentage agreement of ratings were 69.0% to 83.3% (mean 78.1%) , and the 95% confidence limits for a single reading were±0.35year to ±0.56year for China 05RUS-CHN. Conclusions:The present findings suggest that the reliability levels of skeletal age assessment were enhanced with repeatedly training and experience in using China 05RUS-CHN.The percentage agreement in ratings and the systematic and random error of skeletal age assessment should regularly be estimated for increasing quality work of practice.