叶强. 2014: 论体育在现行宪法中的解释. 体育科学, 34(6): 68-74. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2014.06.002
    引用本文: 叶强. 2014: 论体育在现行宪法中的解释. 体育科学, 34(6): 68-74. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2014.06.002
    YE Qiang. 2014: Discussion on Current Interpretation of Sports in Constitution. China Sport Science, 34(6): 68-74. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2014.06.002
    Citation: YE Qiang. 2014: Discussion on Current Interpretation of Sports in Constitution. China Sport Science, 34(6): 68-74. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.2014.06.002

    论体育在现行宪法中的解释

    Discussion on Current Interpretation of Sports in Constitution

    • 摘要: 体育法学的研究不能没有宪法的介入。体育的概念、体育是否具有基本权的性质, 宪法能否指引体育法修改的方向, 这些问题都可以从宪法规范中寻找答案。从源头上, 关于体育概念的争议可以归结为身心问题, 而从身心一元论的观点出发, 结合宪法中的体育条款和受教育权条款, 可以大致理清体育的概念。顺着这一线索, 通过仔细分析宪法中与体育直接相关和间接相关的条款, 虽然不能直接得出体育作为基本权的结论, 但是从中国的近代史以及现实的处境考虑, 有必要赋予体育作为基本权的地位。在这一基础上, 从组织优化的角度剖析了体育法修改过程中的体制问题。

       

      Abstract: The research of sports law can not live without the intervention of the constitution.Whether the concept of sports, the nature of the basic rights of sports and modification of sports law, can find answers from the constitutional norms.From the beginnings, the controversy about the concept of sport can be summed up as body-mind relation, and from the viewpoint of body and mind monism, combining with the sports clauses and education article in the constitution, we can clarify the concept of sports.Along this clue, through careful analysis of terms that are directly and indirectly related to sports, although we cannot directly come to the conclusion that sports is the basic rights, but from China's modern history and the reality, it is necessary to give sports as status of the basic rights.Based on it, we points out sports law system problem in the process of modification from the perspective of organization optimization.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回