李国强, 江崇民, 李米环. 2016: 城区成年人静坐行为模式研究. 体育科学, 36(3): 52-60,66. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.201603006
    引用本文: 李国强, 江崇民, 李米环. 2016: 城区成年人静坐行为模式研究. 体育科学, 36(3): 52-60,66. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.201603006
    LI Guo-qiang, JIANG Chong-min, LI Mi-huan. 2016: Study on Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in Chinese Adults. China Sport Science, 36(3): 52-60,66. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.201603006
    Citation: LI Guo-qiang, JIANG Chong-min, LI Mi-huan. 2016: Study on Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in Chinese Adults. China Sport Science, 36(3): 52-60,66. DOI: 10.16469/j.css.201603006

    城区成年人静坐行为模式研究

    Study on Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in Chinese Adults

    • 摘要: 目的:确定城区成年人静坐行为模式,并探讨静坐行为模式与社会人口、行为方式和健康变量的关系。方法:采用横断面研究方法,选取上海和南京两地无肥胖遗传史、明显严重疾病、残疾、神经功能受损和心理疾病的408名成年人作为研究对象。受试者在完成健康和社会人口学问卷的同时提供身高、体重测量值。采用活动日志评估受试者静坐行为时,佩戴加速度计客观地测量其身体活动状况,进而验证活动日志评估静坐行为的效度。静坐行为模式由聚类分析确定,继而采用判别分析对分类效果进行验证。结果:确定混合、娱乐、工作和屏幕前4种静坐行为模式对人群的分类效果较好,成年人参与娱乐和屏幕前静坐行为模式人群比例达62.9%,是我国城市居民最主要的静坐行为模式;不同模式间年龄和学历变量呈显著差异,年龄越大静坐行为模式中人群比例越高,工作静坐行为模式中高学历人群比例最高,达62.2%;≥10 000步/天者在4种静坐行为模式中的人群比例远低于<10 000步/天组,“30min/天中等强度身体活动”受试者中仅38.6%能超过“10 000步/天”的目标,两者并非一致;超重肥胖组和患慢性病组参与静坐行为模式的人群比例远低于BMI正常组和不患慢性病组,但差异无统计学意义。结论:混合静坐行为模式、屏幕前静坐行为模式、工作静坐行为模式和娱乐静坐行为模式对样本人群具有较高的区分度,是最佳的聚类方案;年龄越大静坐行为模式中人群比例越高,老年人习惯于混合静坐行为模式;学历越高参与工作静坐行为模式的人群比例越高;不同模式间受试者行为方式和健康变量差异无统计学意义,提示,静坐行为并非影响肥胖及慢性疾病发生的唯一风险因素,体力活动与膳食营养的作用也应考虑。

       

      Abstract: Objective:The aim of this study was to identify patterns of sedentary behavior in Chinese adults and examine associations between these patterns,sociodemographic,behavioral manners and health variables.Methods:A total of 408 adults without obesity genetic history,severe acute or chronic illness,disability,neural function damage and mental illness were enrolled in the study.Participants completed a health and sociodemography questionnaire and provided height and weight value.Sedentary behavior was assessed by physical activity log,in the meantime,accelerometer was used to measure objectively physical activity status and to verify the validity of physical activity log in evaluating sedentary behavior.Pattern of sedentary behavior was identified by clustering analysis,classification effect was verified by discriminant analysis.Results:four sedentary patterns were identified:mixed sedentary behavior pattern,entertainment sedentary behavior pattern,occupational sedentary behavior pattern and screen-based sedentary behavior pattern.Its effect is better to classify the crowd,the percentage of adults is62.9% in screen-based sedentary behavior pattern and entertainment sedentary behavior pattern,these two kinds of patterns are the main patterns of urban residents in our country.Age and education variables show significant differences among four patterns,the percentage of the elders is higher in four patterns,the percentage of people educated highly is 62.2%in occupational sedentary behavior pattern.The percentage of people in ≥10000steps/day group is much less than the<10000steps/day group,participants in “30minutes/day MVPA”is only38.6% exceed the goal of “≥10000steps/day”,they are not consistent.The percentage of people in overweight-obesity group and suffering from chronic diseases group is much less than normal weight group and non-suffering from chronic diseases group,there is no statistical significance.Conclusion:mixed sedentary behavior pattern,entertainment sedentary behavior pattern,occupational sedentary behavior pattern and screen-based sedentary behavior pattern are optimal clustering scheme,it can better distinguish the samples.the percentage of the elders is higher in four patterns,the elder was used to especially take part in mixed sedentary behavior pattern.the percentage of the well-educated people is higher in occupational sedentary behavior pattern.Step/day,MVPA,obesity and chronic disease variables show significant differences among four patterns,it is obvious that sedentary behavior is not the only risk factor of obesity and chronic disease,important of physical activity and dietary should be considered.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回