中、美两国体育产业财税政策比较研究
The Comparison Study of the Financing and Taxing Policies in Sport Industry between China and the USA
-
摘要: 为提升财税政策对体育产业的激励作用, 推动我国体育产业更健康快速地发展, 主要采用内容分析法, 从财税收入政策、支出政策和管理政策3个维度对中、美两国在体育产业发展中常见的财税政策进行比较研究。研究发现, 中国体育财税政策建立在收入支出管理的框架下, 以公益优先, 政策工具相对匮乏, 未能体现体育产业特性;美国体育财税政策, 侧重产业效应, 体现出多样性与灵活性, 更突出财税的受益原则, 具有针对性特征。建议我国在探索、发展中国特色体育财税政策体系的同时, 注重体育财税政策的多样化和个性化, 充分体现财税的受益原则, 在公益优先的基础上, 兼顾体育产业效率, 科学划分中央与地方体育财政事权和支出责任。Abstract: In order to promoting the financing and taxing policies accelerate sustainable development of the sport industry in China. We mainly use the Contents Analysis to compare the financing and taxing policies in sport industry between the China and the USA from income policies, expenditure policies and management policies perspectives. We find:The financing and taxing policies constructed in income and expenditure framework, laid stress on public welfare, lack policy tools, the characteristics of the sport industry overlooked in China. The financing and taxing policies are rich, various and flexible in the USA. It is focusing on the characteristics of the sport industry. So we should learn from the USA in the financing and taxing policies in the sport industry, such as focusing on the characteristics of the sport industry, obeying the Benefit Law, balancing the economic and social benefits, and properly allocating financial routine powers and expenditure responsibilities between central government and local government.
下载: