不同运动方式对肥胖大鼠骨骼肌PGC-1α/FNDC5/PPARγ信号通路的影响

    The Effects of Different Modes of Exercise on PGC-1α/FNDC5/PPARγ Signaling Pathway in Skeletal Muscle of Obese Rats

    • 摘要: 目的:通过高脂膳食诱导肥胖大鼠模型, 观察抗阻运动、有氧运动以及抗阻运动与有氧运动相结合3种运动方式对肥胖大鼠骨骼肌PGC-1α/FNDC5/PPARγ信号通路的影响, 以及该通路在运动调控体重中的作用机制。方法:8周龄雄性SD大鼠适应性喂养1周后, 随机分为正常对照组 (CON组, 8只) 和肥胖造模组, 肥胖组造模成功后, 从中随机选取32只分为肥胖对照组 (OC组) 、肥胖有氧运动组 (OAE组) 、肥胖抗阻运动组 (ORE组) 、肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组 (OARE组) , 每组8只。有氧运动采用跑台方式进行, 最大强度20m/min。抗阻运动采用负重爬梯方式, 适应性训练1周后, 以大鼠体重的20%为初始负重, 逐渐递增, 最大负重量达大鼠体重的100%, 隔天训练, 总训练时间为12周。OARE组采用跑台和爬梯交替进行, 强度与OAE组和ORE组相同。采用实时荧光定量PCR测定骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5及PPARγ的mR NA相对表达量;WesternBlot法测定骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5以及PPARγ蛋白的表达量。结果:1) 经过12周的运动干预后, 肥胖抗阻运动组、肥胖有氧运动组、肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组大鼠的体重都显著低于肥胖对照组 (P<0.05) , 并且肥胖有氧运动组和肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组大鼠的体重显著低于肥胖抗阻运动组 (P<0.05) ;2) 肥胖有氧运动组大鼠的体脂率显著低于肥胖对照组 (P<0.05) , 肥胖抗阻运动组以及肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组大鼠的体脂率低于肥胖对照组, 高于肥胖有氧运动组, 但都没有显著性差异 (P>0.05) ;3) 肥胖抗阻运动组、肥胖有氧运动组以及肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5、PPARγ的mR NA和蛋白表达量都显著高于肥胖对照组 (P<0.05) ;肥胖有氧运动组骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5、PPARγ的mR NA和蛋白表达量显著高于肥胖抗阻运动组以及肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组 (P<0.05) , 肥胖抗阻运动+有氧运动组骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5、PPARγ的mR NA和蛋白表达量显著高于肥胖抗阻运动组 (P<0.05) ;4) 大鼠骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5及PPARγ的mR NA及蛋白表达量与大鼠体重、体脂重量、体脂百分比呈负相关, 且都具有显著性差异 (P<0.05, P<0.01) 。结论:抗阻运动、有氧运动以及抗阻运动与有氧运动相结合虽然运动方式不同, 但均能上调肥胖大鼠骨骼肌PGC-1α、FNDC5、PPARγ的mR NA和蛋白表达量, 促进白色脂肪“棕色化”, 进而达到减脂的目的。研究所采用的抗阻运动以及抗阻运动与有氧运动相结合方式对肥胖大鼠骨骼肌PGC-1α/FNDC5/PPARγ信号通路的上调程度及减脂效果, 虽然没有有氧运动效果好, 但从时间效益上来说抗阻运动以及抗阻运动与有氧运动相结合方式所用时间短, 效果也相当明显, 运动强度等参数可能是导致这一现象的关键因素。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To explore the effects of resistance exercise, aerobic exercise or resistance+aerobic exercise on PGC-1α/FNDC5/PPARγ signaling pathway in skeletal muscle of obese rats and its mechanisms in exercise regulating body weight. Methods: Diet-induced obese SD rats were randomly divided into obesity control group (OC group) , obesity aerobic exercise group (OAE group) , obesity resistance exercise group (ORE group) and obesity resistance+aerobic exercise group (OARE group) , 8 rats in each group. The aerobic exercise was performed by running on an animal treadmill, the maximum speed was 20 m/min. The resistance exercise was performed by using a load climbing ladder, after one-week adaptive training, the initial load was set as 20% of the rats' weight, the load was gradually increased to the maximum of 100% of the rats' weight. The resistance exercise was trained every two days for 12 weeks. In OARE group, the aerobic and resistance exercise were conducted alternately, and the intensity was the same as those in OAE and ORE groups. The mR NA and protein expression levels of PGC-1α, FNDC5 and PPARγ were detected by qRTPCR and Western Blotting. Results: 1) After exercise training, the body weight of 3 exercise groups were significantly lower than the OC group (P<0.05) , and the OAE and OARE groups were significantly lower than the ORE group (P<0.05) ; 2) The body fat percentage of the OAE group was significantly lower than that of the OC group (P<0.05) , the body fat percentage of the ORE and OARE groups were lower than that of the OC group but higher than the OAE group with no significant difference (P>0.05) ; 3) The relative expression levels of PGC-1α, FNDC5 and PPARγ mRNA and protein in the ORE, OAE, OARE groups were significantly higher than that of the OC group (P<0.05) ; the relative expression levels of PGC-1α, FNDC5 and PPARγ mRNA and protein in the OAE group were significantly higher than the ORE and OARE groups (P<0.05) ; the relative expression levels of PGC-1α, FNDC5, and PPARγ mR NA and protein in the ORE group were significantly higher than the OARE group (P<0.05) ; 4) The relative expression levels of PGC-1α, FNDC5, and PPARγ mRNA and protein in the gastrocnemius of rats were negatively correlated with the body weight, body fat weight and body fat percentage (P<0.05, P<0.01) . Conclusion: The aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, or resistance+aerobic exercise was effectively in increasing the gene and protein expression levels of PGC-1α, FNDC5, and PPARγ, which promoted the “browning” of white fat tissue and reduced body fat. The effects of resistance exercise or resistance+aerobic exercise on the PGC-1α/FNDC5/PPARγ signaling pathway was not as effective as that of aerobic exercise, however, these two exercise types were revealed a better effect on reducing body fat in terms of time, and the exercise intensity may be the key factor leading to this phenomenon.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回