我国优秀女子赛艇运动员测功仪6 km、60 min测试功率与其无氧阈功率的一致性研究

    The Consistency of Power between 6-km or 60-min Tests on Rowing Ergometer and Anaerobic Threshold in Elite Female Rowers

    • 摘要: 目的:探索赛艇测功仪6 km测试功率 (P6) 及60 min测试功率 (P60) 和无氧阈功率 (P4) 之间的一致性, 以便在6km和60min两种测试方法中寻求能替代无氧阈测试的方法。方法:86名我国优秀女子赛艇运动员作为测试对象, 收集整理其2009年1月-2018年1月期间赛艇测功仪6km和60min的测试结果, 以及同时进行的三级递增负荷测试数据, 对P6和P4、P60和P4之间进行配对t检验、线性回归分析 (Pearson相关) 、组内相关系数以及一致性分析 (Bland-Altman法) 。结果:P6明显高于P4 (P<0.01) , P60和P4无明显差异 (P>0.05) , P6和P4、P60和P4之间存在高度相关, ICC检验认为, P6和P4、P60和P4之间均具有良好的一致性, 但Bland-Altman检验认为, 仅P60和P4之间具有较好的一致性。结论:P60和P4之间不存在明显差异, 具有高度相关和较好的一致性, 因此, 采用赛艇测功仪60 min测试所得结果能代表三级递增负荷测试所得无氧阈功率。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To investigate the consistency of power between 6-km test (P6) or 60-min test (P60) on rowing ergometer and anaerobic threshold (P4) . Methods: The power data of P6, P60 and P4 were collected from 86 female elite rowers from January 2009 to January 2018. The paired T test, Pearson test, ICC and Bland-Altman test were used to do data analysis. Results: The power of P6 was significantly higher than P4 (P<0.01) , but no significant difference was found between P60 and P4 (P>0.05) . The power of P6 was highly related with P4, and the relationship between P60 and P4 was significantly as well. The ICC test showed a good consistency between P6 & P4, as well as P60 & P4. However, the Bland-Altman test showed only P60 & P4 have a good consistency. Conclusion: The power of P60 was highly related with P4 and the data was good consistency between these two tests. Thus, the 60-min test on rowing ergometer can be considered as an alternative method to measure athletes' power in replacing the anaerobic threshold test.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回