国外小学体智融合教学学业效益研究的方法学问题探析

    Methodological Problems in Analyzing the Academic Benefits of Movement Integrated Lessons among Primary School Students

    • 摘要: 部分体智融合教学自推行以来取得了显著的学业效益,但与其相关的效益获得机制研究至今尚无定论。效益来源假说依中介变量可区分为运动的认知功能提升假说和运动的学习行为优化假说,但两者均未得到已有研究结果一致的支持;在实验干预中存在干预剂量依据不明、干预周期过短、干预过程执行监控不力等问题;在效益测量与评价上存在评价内容上靶向不明,评价工具的标准化水平不一,测量等值水平较低等问题。后续研究应当从完善效益来源假说入手,构建有效整合认知功能、学习行为、健康水平的融合假说,通过合理规划干预剂量,提高运动剂量落实水平,提高评价工具有效性与等值性,丰富评价指标等途径弥补当前研究在干预与测评方面存在的缺欠,提高研究的内部效度和外部效度,完善运动刺激-学业表现的路径,完整阐释体智融合教学学业效益的发生机制。

       

      Abstract: Some evidence of movement integrated lessons showed a significant promotion of students' academic achievement, but the underlying mechanism remains unclarity. The existing hypotheses interpret these benefits as the consequence of physical activityrelated cognitive function promotion or on-task behavior promotion, but neither gained consistent evidence. Meanwhile, intervention protocol disadvantages include the lack of dosage reference, short interventional period, and poor implementation. The assessments are off-targeted, unstandardized, and at a disadvantage of equality. Future studies should firstly construct a comprehensive hypothesis that integrated cognitive function, learning behavior, and estimation of health conditions. In order to promote the initials and external validation of studies, set intensity and duration for intervention protocol with experimental and practical reference,administrating the interventional dosage strictly, choose effective measures with satisfied equality, and including more effective indexes. Future studies would show how physical activity affects academic performance and interpret the underlying mechanism of how movement integrated lessons improve academic performance.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回