我国体育仲裁机制促进体育协会治理法治化路径研究

    Pathways for Sports Arbitration Mechanism to Promote the Rule of Law in Sports Association Governance

    • 摘要: 在“十五五”开局之年,国家体育总局落实党中央决策部署实施体育领域“深化治理年”行动,着力推动体育治理体系和治理能力现代化。2022年《中华人民共和国体育法》修订确立体育仲裁法律制度,开启体育纠纷法治化解决的新阶段。研究以仲裁裁决实践为基础,系统考察体育仲裁促进体育协会治理法治化的制度基础与实践机制。依托体育仲裁制度特点和核心要素,以建议性裁决理由为主、否定性裁决结果为辅,坚持一般法律原则的指导,通过对体育协会自治规则合法性与合理性的审查,推动协会完善内部规则体系、规范权力运行边界,初步显现出体育仲裁超越纠纷解决的以裁促治的隐性制度价值。据此构建“事前合规强化—事中裁判细化—事后反馈深化”的具体路径,使体育仲裁不仅成为落实“深化治理年”行动的核心抓手,更为体育强国战略的实现筑牢坚实的法治保障。

       

      Abstract: In the inaugural year of the 15th Five-Year Plan, the General Administration of Sport of China implemented the “Year of Deepened Governance” initiative in accordance with the decision-making and deployment of the Central Committee of the CPC, striving to advance the modernization of the sports governance system and capacity. The 2022 amendment to the Sports Law established the legal framework for sports arbitration, inaugurating a new phase in the rule-of-law resolution of sports disputes. Drawing on the practice of China Commission of Arbitration for Sport (CCAS) arbitral awards, this article systematically examines the institutional foundations and practical logic through which sports arbitration promotes the rule-of-law governance of sports associations. Leveraging the distinctive features and core elements of the sports arbitration system-prioritizing recommendatory reasoning in awards while supplementing with negative outcomes, and adhering to the guidance of general legal principles-sports arbitration conducts legitimacy and reasonableness reviews of sports associations’ autonomous rules, thereby driving associations to refine their internal rule systems and regulate the boundaries of power exercise. This process has begun to reveal the latent institutional value of sports arbitration that transcends mere dispute resolution, achieving governance through arbitration. Building on these findings, the article constructs a concrete pathway comprising “ex ante compliance reinforcement, in-process adjudicative specification, and ex post feedback deepening”. Consequently, sports arbitration serves not only as a core instrument for implementing the “Year of Deepened Governance” initiative, but also as a solid rule-of-law foundation for the ultimate realization of the sports power strategy.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回